During a hearing in Los Angeles Monday, the judge said that Trump’s tweet from April 2018 expressing skepticism about Daniels’ claim that a man approached her and threatened her in Las Vegas in 2011 appeared to be well within the bounds of free speech.
New book excerpt: Trump urged Roethlisberger to escort Daniels to room instead of bodyguards

After hearing arguments from both sides, the judge said the tweet appeared to be political hyperbole and opinion protected by free speech.
Daniels’ lawyer, Michael Avenatti, vigorously disagreed and told the court that he could prove that Trump acted with malice toward his client.
One of Daniels’ other attorneys told the judge Trump’s tweet was “a false statement of fact and we intend to prove that it’s a false statement of fact.”
Otero did not say when he would rule.